The South Africa Reading Project: Empowering teachers to use Research-based Practices to Artfully Teach the Science of Reading: A blog by Dr. Sam Bommarito

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY
A clarification about the title. Teachers will use what they consider the best practices for each student doing that within the boundaries of each district’s curriculum. Then they will be artfully teaching the science of reading.
The story of the South Africa project being carried out this summer begins with Minda Marshall, a teacher who provides professional development for hundreds of teachers in South Africa. She wrote to me in my blog and asked what she could do for her students. She was most especially concerned about her older students’ grades three through five. They were still functioning at levels below pre-primer. My answer to her was to try giving them professional development based on two books. The books were as follows:

The fluency development lesson
(go to the Benchmark site in the United States to order this)
The Phonics Handbook

(go to the Routlage site in the United States to order this)
I told her the FDL book would help the kiddos cross the bridge between decoding and higher-level comprehension. I added the phonics handbook because she was concerned that not all her teachers were comfortable teaching phonics. Some felt they might need extra support. I also told her that I would help her with the PD around the two books and would do that pro bono. She immediately accepted the offer.
When we first talked about doing this, we were hoping to get at least 15 to 20 teachers involved. That would allow us to do qualitative research around the project. The actual number who volunteered rose to.Xx. As a result of that I asked Dr. Bill Kerns to join the project to create a qualitative research design. I knew that others in the project, like Dr. Tim Rasinski, were more than capable of creating a research design, but I felt it would not be wise to burden them with all the extra work required for a quality research design. After all, they were already committing large amounts of pro bono time to The Project. Dr. Mary Joe Fresh agreed to assist Bill when she could.
Another wonderful development came when both publishers involved agreed to give steep discounts on the price of the books. Everyone in the project will be forever grateful to Benchmark Publications and Rutledge for doing this
It’s now fallen on me to see if I could find funding for the remaining cost. The reason for that is that the teachers in the project are teaching in economically challenged areas, The poverty factor weighs in for the-teachers students and districts. Getting the local funding cost to zero became important . At the moment, a former colleague from my alma mater (UMSL) is asking a philanthropic organization that specializes in projects in Africa if they might be willing to provide a grant for the project. I’ll talk in future blogs about other efforts we might have in order to get the funding to provide these books for free.
What follows now are some of the other posts Miranda has done on Facebook. That should give the reader a good idea of what’s being done in the way of professional development around the two books in the project. One thing I would like to point out is that conscious efforts are being made to adapt the PD about the books to the local districts. Most of the districts have teachers that teach teach in English and students who are taught in English. However, there are a few districts that don’t have that situation. For those districts the project is making accommodations. You can judge for yourself whether those adaptions will be practical or not. Any comments or suggestions are welcome. Please make those to my blog site.
Right now, I am sitting in a motel in Quebec writing this blog. What is Dr. Sam doing in Quebec? The answer is joining another group of. educators who have a project of their own. That project has its own three-decade long story that I will tell next week. That project is based on Piaget’s theories, which explains why I helped them give a presentation about how their project uses Piaget’s Constructivist ideas. My contribution to their presentation was to explain how, in the United States, Constructivist programs are being effectively banned. I asked the researchers in the audience to join their voices with the voices of American researchers like Andy Johnson, P.L. Thomas, Rachel Gabriel and George Hruby who are all pushing back on the ill-conceived notion that there is no place for constructivist practices in literacy education in the United States.
So, it’s been a busy summer for Dr. Sam
The foundation of all the projects discussed in this blog lies in the fact that they view meaning making as the prime goal of reading. They view the brain as a problem-solving entity. There is plenty of research to support that point of view. To problem solve, the brain must have access to a variety of different information. That view of the brain and how it works has a lot of research behind it. But that’s a topic for next week and beyond. I hope my readers realize that what everyone involved in this project has been doing is problem-solving their way into making this project viable. I think there’s a message there. I think we are practicing what we preach.
So, until next week, I’m wrapping things up. I’m still advocating for using practices from all research based points view. I remain concerned about the legislation in the United States that is designed to prevent that. That may very well be the primary topic of many of my blogs this summer.
In the meantime, happy reading and writing. This is Doctor Sam signing off from Quebec Ontario. Please direct any questions or comments you have to my blog, and I will do my best to answer them. My blog is found at https://doctorsam7.blog. Look for the entry about the South Africa project.




To see the full content of Minda’s posts about the project visit her Facebook page.














































